Monday, December 7, 2009

Intermezzo Part One

At this point many more soldiers were active than needed-or could be afforded. Octavian sent Italian veterans older than a certain age back to Italy for their formal discharge, but gave these men no land or money, because at the time Octavian had none to give! Agrippa was sent to deal with these men who had become resentful-and rightfully so. This was not the only sign that Octavian's regime was unpopular.

Maecenas discovered a plot to assassinate Octavian upon his return to Italy. This plot had been clumsily hatched by Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, son of the former deposed triumvir and a nephew of Marcus Brutus. This young man was put to death. Dio writes that Antony and Cleopatra planned to "actually kill [Octavian] by treachery." We can wonder if they were ever in touch with the younger Lepidus? Here we can see another aspect of Octavian's personality that helped him enormously in his rule over the Roman empire-and it's a quality that some other ancient and modern dictators lack or lacked completely. Octavian was more than happy to delegate powers to Agrippa and Maecenas. Of course these were two of the men who had been with him since his childhood and he had no reason not to trust them completely-so Octavian was certainly no fool in who he put his faith in. Octavian allowed both men to read his communiques to the Senate, and correct them if they saw a need for it. He had duplicates made of his seal ring-the image of a sphinx-so that they could seal up his letters again.

The Donations of Alexandria were immeditately canceled. Octavian did depose many minor royal figures-but Octavian confirmed on their thrones the major client kings-Amyntas of Galatia, who had defected to him before Actium; Polemo of Pontus, who had stayed put in his kingdom; and Archelaus of Cappodocia. These men were able rulers, and they knew very well that it was their best interest to stay loyal to whoever ruled Rome. In the case of these men and others, Mark Antony had been a very good judge of character and Octavian didn't see any reason to change the arrangements he had made in this part of the world. For Antony's sake it is only too bad-and a bit strange-that he wasn't a better judge of Octavian's character-or could at least deciphered his ultimate goal!

As to the directly ruled provinces of the empire, reliable and safe colleagues were appointed eventually as proconsuls. For example, Cicero's son Marcus, although drunk quite often, but reliable was given Syria. For the time being, the newly minted province of Armenia was lost. The deposed king of that nation had taken advantage of the distraction of Actium to reclaim his realm. Octavian had no choice but to ignore this slap in the face to Roman power and interests. The decision about what was to be done about the eastern frontier-the Armenians, the Medes, and east of them the untamed Parthians, who still held the lost standards of Crassus from 53 BC-would have to be put on the back-burner for now. Octavian was simply too busy.

Agrippa wrote a disturbing letter to Octavian in January of 30 BC. Octavian was still on Samos when he received it. The letter said that Agrippa wasn't able to handle the Italian veterans who had become openly mutinous and that his prescence was needed immediately. This was a terrible time of year to take a long sea journey because of dangerous storms, but it had to be done. When Octavian disembarked at Brundisium, something happened that let him know that people realized Rome was being ruled be one unchallenged man now. He was met by the entire Senate (except for a couple of praetors and the tribunes), many equites, and great numbers of regular citizens. Octavian received an enthusiastic welcome. This was a singular honor as it was normal for senators to meet a returning ruler outside the gates of Rome, but to get to Brundisium they had travelled 300 miles to do so!

The angry veterans met Octavian at Brundisium too, and he quickly met their demands, although he didn't have enough "liquid" cash to pay them all on the spot. He had to issue promises postdated to the expected fall of Alexandria. This satisified the veterans-for now. But Octavian knew he could not trifle with these promises, and after a month back on Italian soil Octavain returned to Samos, where he made plans for the long-awaited invasion of Egypt.

Unfortunately for Antony and Cleopatra the "theory" of political power ran up against "realpolitik." In theory they should haven't had reason to be unhappy, because they still ruled half the Roman empire. The complete financial and human wealth and reserves should have been theirs to use as they saw fit. However, since Actium, important people in the eastern provinces were unwilling to supply more aid and soldiers to support what they considered a lost cause.

Upon Antony's eventual arrival in Alexandria from Paratonium, he abandoned the palace and his friends. In his emotional despair he chose to live by himself in a quayside house that sat beside Alexandria's great lighthouse, more than 300 feet high, on the island of Pharos. Mark Antony turned 54 on 14 January 30 BC. Cleopatra got him out of his self-pity and misery by throwing a spectacular birthday bash for him. Plutarch wrote: "Cleopatra and Antony now dissolved their celebrated Society of Inimitable Livers and instituted another, which was at least its equal in elegance, luxury and extravagance, and which they called the Order of the Inseperable in Death. Their friends joined it on the understanding that they would end their lives together, and they set themselves to charm away the days with a succession of exquisite supper parties."

The couple knew Octavian would arrive with the coming of spring and march against them. They had no realistic opportunity to escape to some other part of the world, although they had briefly considered Spain and Cleopatra had tried to organize an expedition to Arabia but failed. The lovers were cornered. They had but two options left: negotiate and if that failed, to prepare for a final and futile last stand.

I still have some information written-probably two or three posts worth. I think 3 new posts -although the two below had been done mostly and saved to drafts is enough for now-and I still have one more post at my writing blog to do -that is if the power doesn't go out! The lights began to flicker a bit ago and it is actually stormy and rainy here in the desert tonight, which is weather I love-I would just love it more if I felt better. There is actually a question about the image I used-but I will post this bit first-just in case the power fails-and then if it doesn't come back with a link and my question about it. Thanks again so very much to anyone commenting or reading this blog!

OK-I hope this link works-if it doesn't I won't mess with it anymore. I think I answered my own question anyway. I was trying to see if any images of frescoes or anything had been unearthed at Augutus' house on the Palatine Hill. He was supposed to have had an appreciation for how life was kind of a farce -not to be taken too seriously. There was supposed to have been a frescoe of the tragic and comic masks actors wore in his bedroom. That is what I started to look for image-wise. I found the above image instead and thought it was from his place, but apparently it is from a cave-the Lupercal-very near to where his home was on the Palatine Hill and recently unearthed. So the image is from the cave and not Augustus' place. If the link works scroll down a bit to a November 21, 2007 entry and it tells about it. Again I couldn't be doing this series without Anthony Everitt's excellent book Augustus. I hope to post again very soon. Here is the link. http://chem11.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=UFO&action=print&thread=398

4 comments:

  1. three good posts here devin... thanks!

    it almost makes me feel bad for antony... but then i think that the best tyrant won in the end...

    you asked the question, basically:

    WHAT DID ANTONY THINK OCTAVIAN'S GOAL WAS?

    I don't think that he realized that Octavian intended to reunify the empire and consolidate power in the hands of one man... somehow this eluded him... he must have thought that this was simply ridiculous with the way the roman republic was run and with the pressures of the senate and all the other variables -- veterans, vassals, client kings, etc..

    but thinking of it in terms of current politics, the same thing seems to go... lots of people can't imagine one power ruling the entire world with an iron fist... but then again???

    and i wonder... would this be a new pax romana? or a brutal dictatorship? and who will get to write the history of these fell days?

    again, thanks for the posts... roman history is such a wealth of great stories...

    catch up with you again soon

    jp

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jon-it is going to take me some time to get used to not having the comment moderation thing on haha-I was scrolling down to see if that link worked and noticed i had a comment-at first I was like -huh?;-)
    but you asked and answered some great questions in your comment here-maybe that is why Octavians ultimate goal eluded Antony -he couldn't imagine one man-much less one at that age (early 30s i think) unifying the whole empire -we know at first Antony didn't take Octavian seriously at all-and had serious reservations about his skills and courage
    I also wonder about your last 3 sentences -who will write "our" history -if anybody is left to write it-
    i do think an ultimate goal of some very wealthy and powerful people in our age is to have a one world government -I know many relegate this to conspiracy theory.
    I just don't know it will be intersting to see how it works out-altho i hope not "too" interesting:-)
    I wonder if the reason some predictions I made for the world and the US (unofficial predictions of course) didnt work out is because the world is so fragmented and huge that any one group can't hope to control the whole show.
    I very seriously thought that the last administration was going to be the "last" so to speak and 43 or people from his govt the leaders from here on out.
    I thought they would come up with some crisis-invent one even-and suspend the constitution
    I have had people laugh in my face for suggesting such-but the idea was "floated" about canceling the 2004 election because of "potential" terror threats-and of course this doesn't even get into the powers the UN-Patriot Act gives a president in a time of crisis

    ps i saw the "cancel the 2004 election" thoughts in real time-i was trying to monitor the enemy haha-"Faux" news-and Sean Hannity was bloviating about it and i could tell the inference was that being the brave americans we are that we should just cancel the election at the first sign of terrorism -and of course have 43 as the prez until the "crisis" haha was over-and um seeing how this so called "war" isn't supposed to end for over a hundred years-well i dont have to paint a picture haha

    so now I wonder-was my prediction of a bush administration in perpetuity wrong-because it was just plain wrong and that was never the plan anyway-or did one very powerful faction win out over another very powerful faction -kind of thinking along the lines of "The Yankee and Cowboy War" -but up a few notches
    Jeff Wells had a wonderful bit in his book "Rigorous Intuition" about how the workings of these powerful people seen from our low level -how we might not be able to discern a difference-but how in reality-the clusters of combining and fragmenting interests of these powerful folks could actually be quite large from their viewpoint
    all the best to you as always and I so enjoy your comments here-thanks a million!!
    I will try to get to "A Blade of Grass" this am -and if not the very next time i am online
    take care my friend!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Devin,
    Not sure that it matters if it's prez 43 or 53 or whatever... the move has been (since WWI) to centralize control into the office of the prez... whereas before, the main body of power was the house of reps... and yeah... as you observe... it takes convincing to get people to give up their constitutional rights... I think you've got a good read on this situation (not just because I agree with your analysis either)...

    thanks for the response here... catch up with you again soon

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks so much for your continued comments here Jon! Damn-I almost missed another-will have to go back and double check i am catching these as i am not used to comments not going to my email first -very much agree with your analysis-and no it doesn't matter really who is in the "top seat" chairman whatever-they do as they are told -well I think anyway-I always thought 43 was just such a huge embarrassment as a nation to have as a head of state -I wonder if we will outdo him when all is said and done?
    I keep on reading how many people are showing up to Sarah Palin events -the booksignings are the latest-in a normal country i don't think this is someone that would even have a poltical career (maybe I am wrong about this) much less a possible presidential contender if i am reading what people are saying right.
    It is amazing how your thoughts change over the years-I read a book called "The Twilight of the Presidency" in the 1980s-and agreed at the time that because of certain things the presidency was becoming a powerless office (it wasn't written from a conspiratorial angle)
    and now of course the president at any time can become an essential dictator at any point they declare an emergency-I think anyone who wants to do this will wait until there is something horrific that happens-but horrific events happen all the time-whether they are "made" to happen or otherwise!
    all the best to you and I hope to chat with you again very soon also on your blog or mine-thanks again for the comments!!

    ReplyDelete