Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Augustus Ascendant Part 3

From Anthony Everitt's Augustus on page 206: "The end of the civil wars brought a substantial peace dividend. A grand total of sixty legions under arms in 31 B.C. was reduced to the minimum necessary to guard the empire from external invasion. Octavian set the number at twenty-eight legions, or about 150,000 men, all of whom were Roman citizens. These ere brigaded with about the same number of auxiliary troops, noncitizens recruited from the less Romanized and less military secure provinces (for example, Gaul and northern Africa). These auxiliaries often served near or in their homelands-a sensible policy, for it gave the provinces an active role in their own defense."

The army had a permanent prescence in the areas where it was most needed: along the frontiers in the east and northern Africa, Spain, northeast Gaul, and the Balkans. These reserves were sufficient, however, there weren't any men to send to areas where any conflict might occur. During his short life to this point, Octavian had learned a great deal about public finance, and to reduce public spending it seems he was willing to take a gamble on a just-adequate military.

Then he looked into civilian matters. Suetonius believes that Octavian pondered deeply about restoring the Republic after Actium. However, this flies in the face of everything we know about his sure and steady climb to absolute power. Dio thought that a debate was held where Arippa argued for a republican constitution, and Maecenas spoke of the benefits of a monarchy. This debate probably never happened, but Octavian did manage to cleverly mesh these two opposing principles. As always, Octavian took his time to decide how to go about this-three years in this case.

Octavian and Agrippa held the consulships together in 28 BC-this was Octavian's sixth time as consul. The pair annulled all of the acts of the triumvirs and promised that there would never be a return to the civil bloodbaths of the past. The consuls also assumed censoria potestas, the power of censors. The censors had been two senior and very trusted officials elected every five years. They had three major tasks: first to hold a lustrum or general ritual purification of the people; second to perform a census of Roman citizensl third to supervise the conduct of citizens-especially members of the Senate.

Going back to Anthony Everitt's Augustus on page 207: "The census held by Octavian and Agrippa revealed that there were 4,063,000 citizens (we do not know whether the number included women and children). A more ticklish job was to identify and weed out senatorial undesirables. The number of senators was reduced from one thousand to a somewhat more manageable eight hundred. As Suetonius records, this was a highly unpopular procedure. At the meeting when the outcome of the review of the Senate was announced, Octavian is said to have worn a sword and steel corselet beneath his tunic. Senators were allowed to approach only after their togas were searched."

The new regime still wasn't ready to put the ship of state on a long-term course. However, an incident occurred shortly after this involving Marcus Licinius Crassus, the grandson of Julius Caesar's onetime colleague, that showed the rules of the new political order should be put in effect sooner rather than later.

Marcus had returned to Rome after a very successful campaign on the Macedonian frontier. He wanted not only a triumph but also a spolia opima. This very esteemed honor was granted to a general who had killed the enemy commander with his own hands and took his armor, the spolia opima or splendid spoils. This was done by only two other men in the history of the state before Crassus.

The problem was that absolute control of the legions was essential to Octavian's hold on power, and he didn't feel he could allow an independent man to gain such a high military reputation. A technicality was cited to prevent Crassus from dedicating the armor of his defeated opponent in the tiny Temple of Jupiter Feretrius on the Capitol, but he was allowed his triumph. Afterwards, though, history tells us nothing about him, so we are left to wonder if his iverreaching-at least in the eyes of the new regime brought his military career to an early end.

Finally in 27 BC, Octavian, aged thirty-six, was ready to unveil his constitutional blueprint. On 1 January he began his seventh consulship with Agrippa once again as his colleague. From Augustus on page 208: "On the Ides (the thirteenth of the month) he made a most extraordinary speech to the Senate-perhaps the most important speech of his life. Dio gave him words that cannot have been very far from those he actually uttered: I lay down my office in its entirety and return to you all authority absolutely-authority over the army, the laws and the provinces-not only those territories which you entrusted to me, but those which I later secured for you.

"For most of Octavian's listeners, the statement came as a shock. No one knew exactly how to react, and his cautious audience either believed him or pretended to. While he was speaking, senators broke in with shouts and interjections."

After Octavian sat down, the protests continued. He made a great display of reluctance, but allowed himself to be "argued" into accepting a very large "province" for ten years. This so-called province consisted of Gaul, Spain and Syria. Octavian would have proconsular authority over these lands: he would be able to appoint legates, or choose deputies to rule them in his stead while he remained consul at Rome. All the other provinces of the empire would come under direct senatorial management the same as before: the Senate would appoint former consuls and praetors to govern them.

The Senate certainly wasn't lax in showing its gratitude towards Octavian for this. The doorposts of his house were adorned with laurel and the lintel with oak leaves for rescuing Roman citizens from death. Octavian would later boastfully recall how a golden shield was put in the Senate House, "in recognition of my valor, my clemency, my justice and my piety."

Then there was the most glorious honor bestowed upon him-a change of name. One idea was to call Octavian by the name of Rome's original founder-Romulus. However, Romulus had made himself a king, and even worse-one tale had him murdered by angry senators-the same fate Octavian's first patron met! A much better idea was to call him Augustus, meaning "Revered One." Thus it was agreed and Octavian's official name was now Imperator Ceasar Augustus. A more modest title was adopted for casual use: princeps, "first citizen." These new names ushered in a new political era for Rome and a makeover for Octavian-the formerly bloodsoaked triumvir was now Augustus, the law-abiding princeps.

These acts of largely political theater were acted out primarily to assure the Senate that he was not leading Rome down the same path as his adoptive father-an autocracy-or even something similar to a Hellenistic monarchy. Octavian-now Augustus believed-and perhaps he was on the money with this thought-that if enough senators felt he was following in Julius Caesar's footsteps he would be the star of his own Ides of March.

Augustus also had to keep the ruling class happy so they would apply their skills to the arduous task of the day-to-day running of the empire. From Augustus on page 208: "The Senate was not quite the body it had been. New men from the Italian countryside had filled many gaps left the the old governing families that had been weakened in the civil wars or had lost their money and estates. Many came from regions that had received citizenship as little as fifty years before. Theirs was an Italian rather than a Roman identity. Even more controverially, leading men from southern Gaul and Spain, provinces that had long since adopted the Roman language and culture, were recruited as senators. All these arrivestes saw their fate as inextricably linked to the new regime. So did a good number of impoverished aristocrats, for the astute Augustus took good care to fund them generously and thereby constrain their freedom to oppose him. He bound other noble clans to him by arranging marriages with his relatives."

However much power Augustus managed to accrue, members of the Senate still felt a deep patriotic belief in Rome's constitution, and would never accept one-man rule. These men presumed the Roman empire and its rule and administration to remain a collective undertaking-even if it were led by one man.

In the end Augustus didn't really give back any real power to the Senate and the people of Rome, and in the final analysis he owed his preeminent position to the army. To a lesser extent he also owed his newly minted position to the people, who could be relied on to reelect him to the position of consul as many times as he wished.

This will probably be the last article on this blog for this year. I hope to do much more here next year. Thanks again to Jon and anyone else who reads or follows this blog for your fantastic thoughts and comments! I hope you all have a beautiful and joyous 2010!

12 comments:

  1. hi Devin...

    first thanks for dropping by my blog and leaving your precious words... leading me to you invaluable blog... the other day i came here but could not leave any comments... just could be a follower...
    i've got lots of problems with my internet...

    the things you write about are really great as they can help us review the way man has come through history... his mistakes... the things he has learned...

    i didn't read this as i should start it from the beginning... and i'm not in a focused state of mind... how can i be when a very bloody but important page is turning over in my country's history now...

    but this part of the essay caught my eye:

    "However much power Augustus managed to accrue, members of the Senate still felt a deep patriotic belief in Rome's constitution, and would never accept one-man rule. These men presumed the Roman empire and its rule and administration to remain a collective undertaking-even if it were led by one man."

    since my teens i have always been interested in understanding the reason why people of a society or members of a group accept the rule of just one person... it is not just the authoritative or the oppressive character of the ruler... through time, i could come to an answer... the more people are socially and personally mature, the more they are willing to accept responsibility (for their actions)... when they are not so, they tend to put the responsibility on someone else's shoulders... and here some psychological and mythological recurrent themes are seen... the archetype of sacrificing the king.... or the theme of the scapegoat... also the defense mechanism called projection is applicable here... people start to attribute the decay of state to just one person and by overthrowing or killing him think the problem is sloved whereas another cycle begins and after sometime the things are the same... as the frame of thought is unchanged...

    just when people are trained (better to be from childhood) to accept their responsibilies and their social role in any collective endeavor, the problem of one-man ruler and dictatorship can be solved in the long run... and in many societies there have been big steps toward this state of mind (both personally or socially)...

    also the negative role of religions (religions... not spirituality) in fixating this immaturity is revealed... since they all tend to keep people as some obedient followers...


    ahhh... i'm rambling...
    :)

    love when people think and help others think... love your bog...
    :)
    keep up the great job...


    wish you the best in your new year...

    ReplyDelete
  2. human being-thanks once again for your wonderful insights and very valuable comments!!
    I wanted to say also again that I hope you are safe -when you talked about the archetype of sacrificing the king -this so reminded me of the flag that Iranians in the USA were flying in Los Angeles (the caption read) I was surprised to see the "old" flag of the shah -not that I exactly expected the flag of the Islamic Republic to be flying -but i thought to myself-"well certainly I don't think there could be many Iranians wanting the days of the shah back either"-of course on closer inspection of your commnent you are obviously talking worldwide too-and I think of President Kennedy in this country with that motif -This is indeed in all cultures I suppose- along with the "one ruler" archetype or motif whatever one wants to call it-
    I think the more socially immature a country is the more it leans to fascism also -one man rule -and the like-I feel really surprised at some thinking expressed by a lot of people in the USA-I thought we were supposed to value freedom and democratic thought here above all else-but it has seemed to me that -especially after 11 sept -that we want to throw away all of our freedoms (which one could argue whether we "really" have or not) in the name of security-and this is an ephemeral security indeed!

    Well now I am going on -but the thing is is that I am not making any sense-and you were!!
    I hope to be back online soon-and I very much hope that you are safe where you are at!!
    I will very much be hoping and praying the violence doesn't spread in your country and a peaceful solution can be found-when you can please let me know how you are doing -and i will check on your blog too- all the best to you and happy new year too-and thanks again for the wonderful comments!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. came ealier to answer you... your precious answers to me here... on your other blog... on on mine... but i couldn't... i got disconnected repeatedly... and now i'm here again... perhpas i should come another time... i cannot talk... write now... the only thing ringing in my mind is this:


    it's raining in my room
    the window is cloudy
    the keyboard's pouring
    there will be a flood

    the wizard at the corner
    mummifies the butterflies
    and sells them to people
    as umbrellas

    dams damn the boats
    and boats remember their oaths

    was there any dragons
    on noah's arc?




    Devin... you ARE making sense 'cause you are a sensitive sensible soul...

    namaste!

    ReplyDelete
  4. and... (not to put words in your mouth) is because our friend is a student of history...

    and does this history not repeat??? is agustus not still here???

    what metaphor could be repeated???

    i hear an old saying...


    history is only repeated by those who are foolish enough not to have learned from it...

    and i guess that's me... and all of us here in canada...

    sorry to make your site political devin...

    ReplyDelete
  5. rome is still the empire... and we try to worm our way out from the thumb

    ReplyDelete
  6. or wait...




    is cicero not still here?

    ReplyDelete
  7. no...

    here's that story:

    http://devsquestions.blogspot.com/search/label/Cicero

    ReplyDelete
  8. don't mean to be so negative... I just see so many parallels...

    and damn if they don't make it all seem like a set up...

    ReplyDelete
  9. .

    he is a student of life
    as all of us dead or alive

    history is my little finger
    you cannot take it away form my hand
    and my hand walks with me on the land


    nothing is repeated ever
    x and y can happen again
    but z is a living river

    the world is not happening on a plane
    it's got at least 3 dimensions
    and they're traveling on the cosmic train

    fools do not repeat
    nothing can be repeated ever
    all are here to learn
    even when this is money
    they just care to earn

    you are not a teacher
    don't be a preacher

    fools are those who don't believe
    what's happening in front of their eyes
    and their mind is a constant sieve

    fools are those who keep silent
    to save their fragile security
    they build a lie and call it saftey

    fools are those who don't know
    sharing is all
    and
    all is sharing


    nothing is repeated
    there is always a growth
    steps going forward
    be it blessed or wicked

    don't judge with one closed eye
    then what you see will be a big i
    the spiral is the path
    the path is the spiral

    turning
    and
    turning
    and
    turning

    going
    up
    and
    up
    and
    up

    you say
    it's
    down
    and
    down
    and
    down?

    'cause you are standing
    on my soles

    be my soul
    teach me to walk
    plants can grow
    even on the rock


    x
    y
    z

    x
    y
    z

    x
    y
    z

    cycles

    z
    is always
    busy

    z
    is never
    easy

    z
    is sometimes
    dizzy

    z
    is where we learn
    history


    and history never repeats
    it just teaches and proceeds


    be a teacher and love
    be a lover and teach

    .

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi human being and Jon!! Happy New Year to the both of you !! I am sorry to hear of net connection difficulties human-it was happening to me a lot last year -although I doubt for the same reasons (actually we never did get it figured out)
    I so appreciate both of your beautiful thoughts -poetry-opinions on this blog!!!
    I forgot that this blog doesnt send me emails saying there are new comments-as I didnt think it would be necessary -so I am so glad I checked!!
    I am going to change that today

    I want to stop by and say "hi" and happy new year to both of you in just a minute - i may not be able to do much more than that today as I am struggling with exhaustion/insomnia again-but I am hoping to get lots of sleep tonight -
    in my "collapse" state I usually can at least sleep -and be online much longer tomorrow

    there is actually a "post" ready to go here again if i can just type it tomorrow
    once again I cant tell you how much your friendship and everything else means to me -the only reason I got online today was I didnt want yet another day to pass without some sort of response (altho today mine is so stupid maybe I shouldnt have tried:-)
    to my comments -as I have been doing this a lot lately because of health issues -and even asked a blog friend i personally email today if there is a "netiquette' in regards to time acknowledging comments -if you have the ability to get online -but feel so tired you do not feel you can say anything halfway intelligent -luckily at least I got to see both of your beautiful souls over here -and thanks again for "bearing" with me - it is not for lack of interest when i am not online-i just worry when I am too tired that I dont make a damn bit of sense !!!

    human being- I pray (seriously) which is odd because I have never been sure what I believe metaphysically about who might be listening -but it seems to help in some way-that you are "safe" where you are - every night -I consider my blogfriends like a second 'family' especially as what few friends i had "high-tailed" it out of my life when my going healthwise got rough

    sometimes i so wish there was a way to text message internationally without huge fees -even if it would just be a message this short "I am OK" love and hugs to the both of you-and I hope to chat very soon!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. hi Devin... such a beautiful soul you are!
    am really happy to know you and i should be thankful to Jon for this... as you came via his blog to mine...
    please be relaxed regarding the answers to comments... surely what we care about firstly is the health and happiness of our friends... all of us may have some delays... to tell you the truth, it's been a long time now since i've stopped answering the comments or visiting my dear blogger friends regularly... (mostly because of my internet limitations)... don't impose any obligations on yourself...

    and thanks for your concern my dear friend... i try my best to be safe... and know that your positive thoughts/prayers mean a lot to me... and certainly make a difference... as i really feel how i'm stronger these days because of the positive vibes from dear friends...

    please take good care of yourself...

    love and peace



    ps.
    on a separate note... the addressee of what i wrote in the above comment is a general 'you' as it is the case in all i write...
    i should thank my dear friend Jon for triggering my mind... and you for patiently reading them...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks so very much for this beautiful comment also human being!!
    I am going to try to get away from the "obligations" viewpoint -and thanks for the great advice!!
    I am going to try to post here again tonight/this am if i can keep going -and will try to say hi at your blog if i am on long enough
    I am glad that the postive energy -vibes -and al of this helps you needless to say-I know it does me!!
    love and peace to you also my friend!!

    ReplyDelete